From the category archives:

Inequality

Should Women Man Up?

February 1, 2010

I was a bit perplexed by Clay Shirky’s piece calling for women to be more aggressive and ridiculously self-aggrandizing — to be more like men — in order to level the playing field.  Ann Friedman replies today, and I agree with her when she says:
Just as self-defense classes are not a solution to the problem of campus [...]

Read the full article →

The Middle-Class Stagnation Canard

January 12, 2010

In a post yesterday, Kevin Drum signed on to a conjecture from Raghuram Rajan that stagnating middle-class incomes are partly to blame for the recession and the financial sector blowout. The insuperable problem with this conjecture is that middle-class incomes have not been stagnating. Over at Progressive Fix, Scott Winship lays down the data and reminds [...]

Read the full article →

What Progressive Redistribution Is For

December 15, 2009

It’s terrific to see Dalton Conley, the dean for the social sciences at NYU, write this in the American Prospect:
Inequality — and its consequences — is the wrong target. It’s time for progressives to spend less time trying to prove the effects of inequality on health, growth, and politics and instead start focusing on opportunity for those [...]

Read the full article →

Scott Winship on Income Inequality

November 12, 2009

If you want to know how much income inequality has really risen in recent years, Scott Winship has written a terrific short essay summarizing much of what we now know. And what we know is that almost the entire increase in inequality since the 1980s is attributable to a stupendous rise in incomes at the [...]

Read the full article →

Inequality at Cato Unbound

October 23, 2009

The conversation about economic inequality is in full swing over at Cato Unbound. Here’s my reply to Kenworthy, my reply to Nye, and the first part of my reply to Anderson. And be sure to check out all the panelists’ most recent posts.

Read the full article →

Lane Kenworthy on Consumption Inequality

October 14, 2009

Today at Cato Unbound, University of Arizona economic sociologist Lane Kenworthy replies to my lead essay. That consumption inequality has risen less than income inequality is a point Kenworthy says “I don’t find compelling.”
One reason is that existing analyses of consumption inequality suffer from a problem similar to that which, until recently, hindered the study [...]

Read the full article →

New at Cato Unbound: Me on “Economic Inequality and the Mirage of Injustice”

October 12, 2009

I lead off this month’s Cato Unbound devoted to “Inequality: Facts and Values” with an essay on “Economic Inequality and the Mirage of Injustice.” Replies later this week and next from Arizona economic sociologist Lane Kenworthy, Mason economic historian John Nye, and Michigan political philosopher Elizabeth Anderson.
I draw a good deal from my July inequality [...]

Read the full article →

TNRtv with Chait on Inequality

August 10, 2009

I see that segments of the discussion of inequality between me and Jonathan Chait are up at the New Republic website. You’ll find the links in the column to the right side of the video player.

Read the full article →

Health Care and Income Inequality

August 7, 2009

Gary Burtless and Pavel Svanton of Brookings add to the pile of reasons income inequality statistics are misleading. Here’s the abstract to their paper “Health Care, Health Insurance, and the Relative Income of the Elderly and Nonelderly“:
Cash income offers an incomplete picture of the resources available to finance household consumption. Most American families are covered [...]

Read the full article →

More on Declining Marginal Utility: Reply to Yglesias and Clarke

August 3, 2009

Matt Yglesias and Conor Clarke seem to see the same upshot as Chait in the idea that rich people spend way more than poor people for stuff that isn’t that much better. Here’s Yglesias:
[T]he point here is that the marginal utility of money income declines as it grows. This is also a strong argument for [...]

Read the full article →

Response to Jonathan Chait on Inequality

August 1, 2009

Jonathan Chait devotes his TRB column in the current edition of the New Republic to a critique of my inequality paper. Jonathan and I recently recorded an online chat about inequality for TNR, but I don’t know if it’s going to run. (I’m afraid I was rather meandering.) In any case, I’d like to address [...]

Read the full article →

Ezra Klein on Consumption, Debt, and Inequality

July 29, 2009

Ezra and I chatted a bit on Bloggingheads about the ideas in his post replying to a bit of my paper, but I had yet to read the post, my response was off-the-cuff, and I think I can do better.
So, I noted in my paper that nominal consumption inequality has increased much less than income [...]

Read the full article →

Unequal to the Task

July 29, 2009

I’m been really grateful for the suprising (to me) amount of attention my inequality paper has gotten. There have been a raft of really thoughtful replies, and I want to give them all the thoughtful responses they deserve. I’ve been overloaded the past couple of weeks, in part by this daunting task. But I’m going [...]

Read the full article →

Fed Independence: Too Important to Verify

July 18, 2009

David Boaz has a good post on the economists petitioning against an audit of the Fed on the grounds that its independence from politics is so precious. David concludes:
The Fed can be independent and unaccountable and undemocratic, or it can be subject to the political whims of elected officials; neither is a very attractive prospect.
I don’t [...]

Read the full article →

Manzi’s Questions on Inequality

July 15, 2009

Besides being a brilliant guy, Jim Manzi is to my “right” politically, which I think makes his worries about inequality particularly interesting. He has kindly taken the time to read my paper and has some questions. I’ll take them in turn.
1. Let’s assume that the social mechanisms that produce some highly skewed income distribution do [...]

Read the full article →

Thinking Clearly about Economic Inequality

July 14, 2009

In honor of Bastille Day, and my sister’s birthday, I give you my long-in-the-works Cato paper on inequality. Here’s the very compressed abstract:
Recent discussions of economic inequality, marked by a lack of clarity and care, have confused the public about the meaning and moral significance of rising income inequality. Income statistics paint a misleading picture [...]

Read the full article →

Inequality and the Crash: A Bleg

July 9, 2009

Hello world. Has anyone run across sources of data on the effects of the recession/financial crash on income, wealth, and/or consumption inequality? Or is it just too soon to know?

Read the full article →

The Happiness Gender Gap Again

May 26, 2009

Stevenson and Wolfers’ paper, “The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness,” covered in the Times back in 2007, has just been released as an NBER paper, giving it a second wind. Ross Douthat in his column today argues that it means that we need to do a better job stigmatizing single motherhood. That’s one way we [...]

Read the full article →

Happiness and Income Inequality

May 18, 2009

Yglesias writes:
I think the links between taxation, spending, and inequality are the most plausible explanation of the fact that the highest-taxed countries are the happiest. It can’t be that paying taxes makes Danes happy. But plausibly, living in a relatively egalitarian society makes people happy.
I wrote a paper about this! At the time, the studies [...]

Read the full article →

Support Gay Marriage, Support Religious Freedom

April 14, 2009

Jason Kuznicki points us to this excellent video…

As Jason says:
Couldn’t have said it better. If you take taxpayers’ money, you should have to treat all taxpayers equally. If you’re privately funded, you should be free to do as you like. Want to discriminate? Fine. Just don’t take tax money to do it.
And… if you support [...]

Read the full article →

The Structural Inequality Lobby

February 27, 2009

Tim Carney’s piece on the power of the teachers’ unions and their massive push to drive a stake through the heart of Washington, DC’s modest and locally popular experiment in school vouchers should be sobering to anyone with a romantic view of democracy. 
Beltway bandits, defense contractors, influential industries—most of them pale in their influence efforts compared [...]

Read the full article →

Inequality and American Exceptionalism

February 16, 2009

Princeton sociologist Douglas Massey is one of my favorite scholars. The abstract from his new paper [gated] on “Globalization and Inequality: Explaining American Exceptionalism” will sound familiar to readers of other eminent Princetonians, such as Paul Krugman and Larry Bartels. I’m starting to think of it as “the Princeton Narrative” about inequality in the U.S. 
Globalization [...]

Read the full article →

America’s Checkered Past: Not a Model for the Future

February 11, 2009

Brink Lindsey replies to Matt Yglesias’s criticism of his paper:
I think Matt misunderstands both my argument and what Krugman has been doing. I quite agree that Krugman doesn’t want a full-scale reinstatement of the corporatist, cartelistic policies of yesteryear. I say as much in the paper. What Krugman does want, however, is to portray the [...]

Read the full article →

Inequality and Policy

February 10, 2009

In his interesting post responding to Brink’s new Nostalgianomics paper, Matt Yglesias writes:
I think that in a lot of ways the most interesting recent research on inequality turns out to be about skill-biased technological change after all. Specifically, Claudia Goldin and Lawrence Katz argue in The Race Between Education and Technology that we shouldn’t look at SBTC [...]

Read the full article →

Nostalgianomics

February 9, 2009

Cato has released a great new paper by my friend and colleague Brink Lindsey on “Paul Krugman’s Nostalgianomics:  Economic Policies, Social Norms, and Income Inequality.” Here’s the executive summary:
What accounts for the rise in income inequality since the 1970s? According to most economists, the answer lies in structural changes in the economy–in particular, technological changes [...]

Read the full article →