Sen on the U.N. Fallacy

by Will Wilkinson on February 14, 2010

Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice, p. 143:

There is something of a tyranny of idea in seeing the political divisions of states … as being, in some way, fundamental, and in seeing them not only as practical constraints to be addressed, but as divisions of basic significance in ethics and political philosophy.

I like to call Sen’s “tyranny of idea” the United Nations Fallacy. I’m delighted to see him ride one of my hobbyhorses.

There are, more formally, two fallacies: (1) analytical nationalism and (2) normative nationalism. Analytical nationalism takes states as basic units of explanatory and comparative significance. This error leads to absurdities like comparing social indicators of geographically immense, populous, diverse nation states, such as the U.S. or China, with those of tiny principalities and island states, such as Liechtenstein or Tuvalu. Normative nationalism takes states as basic units of significance in social morality. This error tends to cause us to overlook the immense importance of questions about the justice of the principles that determine inclusion and exclusion in political and economic institutions. So we worry about whether relatively poor people in rich nations are rich enough for our tastes rather than about whether the global system of borders and passports wrongfully traps the world’s poorest people in places with corrupt, immiserating institutions.

[via Matt Zwolinski on Facebook]

  • mariorizzo
    Sen's comments remind me of Woodrow Wilson. Need I say more?
  • Mommsen1625
    Actually, Wilson was very much behind the notion of nations as being natural placeholders for ethnicity, etc., that's why they spent so much time the subject pouring maps of Eastern Europe so as to draw the lines between various ethnic groups appropriately (of course, those on the ground simply ignored them). These sort of activities should not be surprising, Wilson was after all an advocate of scientific racism, eugenics (of the involuntary variety), etc. He's really the most despicable POTUS of all time IMHO.
  • Mario, Yes, you do.
  • bjk
    And after we do away with the nation state, then we'll undermine the nuclear family, punctuation and finally the individual, the last bourgeois illusion! The final stage of libertarianism is socialism . . .
  • And the final stage of socialism is a merging of minds in a collective cosmic consciousness aware of everything at all times all at once. But one step at a time.
  • y81
    "So we worry about whether relatively poor people in rich nations are rich enough for our tastes rather than about whether the global system of borders and passports wrongfully traps the world’s poorest people in places with corrupt, immiserating institutions."

    Or we consider it proper that the government in Washington should apprehend and punish people who set off bombs in Oklahoma City, but not people who direct poison gas attacks in Kurdistan. Obviously these positions are incompatible unless we have first hypostasized national sovereignty and national boundaries.
  • llimllib
    That "lookup" bar at the bottom totally distracted me from reading your article, and I cannot imagine myself using it.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: