<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inequality at Cato Unbound</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/10/23/inequality-at-cato-unbound/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/10/23/inequality-at-cato-unbound/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:25:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DG Lesvic</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/10/23/inequality-at-cato-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-594169</link>
		<dc:creator>DG Lesvic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 05:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3848#comment-594169</guid>
		<description>I meant taking from the rich to give to the poor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant taking from the rich to give to the poor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG Lesvic</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/10/23/inequality-at-cato-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-594168</link>
		<dc:creator>DG Lesvic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 05:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3848#comment-594168</guid>
		<description>The problem with all of your discussions of inequality is that when you fail to challenge the fundamental assumption of the Left, that taking from the rich reduces inequality, you concede it, and are ever after on the defensive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you know that the policy is counterproductive, as, by now, you should know, why are you keeping it a secret?  Whose side are you on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with all of your discussions of inequality is that when you fail to challenge the fundamental assumption of the Left, that taking from the rich reduces inequality, you concede it, and are ever after on the defensive.</p>
<p>If you know that the policy is counterproductive, as, by now, you should know, why are you keeping it a secret?  Whose side are you on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
