You should have been aborted by your clueless mom.

Go back and read my comment again, illiterate one.

And if you were paying attention at the time, you would have picked up on the administration's obvious outright lies, like Dick Cheney saying Iraq was connected to 9/11, and known that shenanigans were afoot.

More importantly, if you were an informed citizen you would have understood at the time what all the talk about “WMD” was about. Confused people like yourself hear WMD and think nukes. Iraq didn't have anything remotely close to bomb building capability, especially fissile material (see Iran's difficulty in openly trying to obtain a bomb, enrichment and/or reprocessing is tough!). The Intel community, rather, knew that Iraq likely had some chemical weapons capability (which turned out to be marginal at best). The distinction between chemical weapons and nuclear bombs is pretty drastic, and destroys the security/preemptive argument. Was Saddam going to shoot mustard shells at the US with his 300 km range Scuds?

Sorry to get on a soapbox, but you know nothing dip-shits (to use your posted name) piss me off, because you were the one's who cheerleader our disastrous invasion. And you're still cheerleading. Have a nice life, and try getting outside your bubble while you're at it.

While I enjoy watching Cramer every night, one must remember the show is primarily entertainment. The financial networks exist to promote their advertisers financial and investment products. Who would expect them to warn about the credit bubble or coming Washington national debt collapse which will destroy much of the remaining private wealth in America today or what this will do to the dollar, the stock market, bonds, gold or the real estate market?

China is now worried about their dangerous over investment in US Treasury obligations. Washington ’s long-term choice is either repudiation or monetization. For monetization to be effective, the depreciation in the dollar would have to be substantial and this in turn would dramatically raise prices of imports for American consumers which would mean a tremendous drop in foreign imports. Debt monetization would cause more disruption to exporting nations than selective repudiation of Treasury debt.

The Campaign to Cancel the Washington National Debt By 12/22/2013 Constitutional Amendment is starting now in the U.S. See: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=675946904...

Thanks,

Ron with 30 plus years in the investment business and banking industry.

In each of these myths you can see the shadow of some more primitive property of our individual lizard brain. Social Connections Good. Not My Genes Bad. Famine Coming! Can I Have Sex That?

Look at Cramer's show. I especially appreciated how Stewart lampooned Cramer's use of props and sound effects. As a rule of thumb, the louder and more strident the conversation, the less light (knowledge) and the more heat (emotional provocation intended to make you more succeptable to advertising) is involved.

Bull. I read his blog regularly. He hasn't said anything like that. You made it up.

This statement, the one I am about to quote, is hysterical and ridiculous: “”But to suggest that CNBC, in giving bad, predatory financial advice, is solely responsible for the bubble we've found ourselves in, and the subsequent losses many Americans have endured is hysterical and ridiculous.”