Comments on: Inerrant Conduit of the General Will http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/09/27/inerrant-conduit-of-the-general-will/ The Sweet Release of Reason Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:41:23 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: wph http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/09/27/inerrant-conduit-of-the-general-will/comment-page-1/#comment-581989 wph Sun, 28 Sep 2008 02:24:04 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1756#comment-581989 Winston my be pondering the emptiness of consumerism, but just try to take that foam bone away from him and he will quickly ponder the joys of consumerism. Winston my be pondering the emptiness of consumerism, but just try to take that foam bone away from him and he will quickly ponder the joys of consumerism.

]]> By: stephen http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/09/27/inerrant-conduit-of-the-general-will/comment-page-1/#comment-581988 stephen Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:00:16 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1756#comment-581988 totally sweet. totally sweet.

]]> By: Michael Drake http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/09/27/inerrant-conduit-of-the-general-will/comment-page-1/#comment-581987 Michael Drake Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:37:25 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1756#comment-581987 Every day, in every way, we're getting metro and metro. Every day, in every way, we're getting metro and metro.

]]> By: rw http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/09/27/inerrant-conduit-of-the-general-will/comment-page-1/#comment-581986 rw Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:21:43 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1756#comment-581986 Winston is onto something. And: Is really cute. Winston is onto something. And: Is really cute.

]]> By: Selfreferencing http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/09/27/inerrant-conduit-of-the-general-will/comment-page-1/#comment-581985 Selfreferencing Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:13:01 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1756#comment-581985 When you mentioned the set of "cosmopolitan libertarian metrosexual econophilosopher bloggers" I assume you meant to use a definite descriptor to pick out only one particular: you. <br><br>An interesting question is whether there are any others. If you drop 'metrosexual' then you can include lots of GMU guys. But Hanson, Kling, Caplan, Cowen, Tabbarok, Boettke, etc. are far from metro. <br><br>You know what? Are you really metro? Because you seem more nerdy than metro. I guess I think they're sort of mutually exclusive. When you mentioned the set of “cosmopolitan libertarian metrosexual econophilosopher bloggers” I assume you meant to use a definite descriptor to pick out only one particular: you.

An interesting question is whether there are any others. If you drop 'metrosexual' then you can include lots of GMU guys. But Hanson, Kling, Caplan, Cowen, Tabbarok, Boettke, etc. are far from metro.

You know what? Are you really metro? Because you seem more nerdy than metro. I guess I think they're sort of mutually exclusive.

]]>