Greeting FARKers

Add New Comment

Subscribe:  This Thread

Go to:  My Comments ·  Community Page

Sort thread by: Hot comments Best comments Newest first Oldest first

Viewing 4 Comments

• 
  • 
  • 
  

  • Permalink
  • Admin
  • • Remove Post
    • Block username
    • Block email
    • Block IP address

  Will Wilkinson 3 months ago 1 point

  Please login to rate.

  Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

  Hey, FARK reader! Look here!
  reply  edit  reblog  flag   record video comment
  3 /people/willwilkinson/ /people/willwilkinson/following/ http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle 851540116 willwilkinson willwilkinson
• 
  • 
  • 
  

  • Permalink
  • Admin
  • • Remove Post
    • Block email
    • Block IP address

  osmium 3 months ago 1 point

  Please login to rate.

  Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

  Hey Will. I'm a long time BHTV watcher, and today I saw your link on Fark, and I thought, Oh no, what happened. The 100 months thing is provocative and hysterical, and it makes me nervous when I see those things. I'm not a climate scientist, but I am an energy scientist (or something like that)--so while I'm not an expert, I think I'm conversant. When I see a technical topic (i.e. what is the timeline for changes in energy technology) become a matter of faith used by people to fight a political tug of war, it makes me wonder: is this a total train wreck, or is this what is supposed to happen with an important question? I am too young to have seen such a thing before.
  reply  edit  reblog  flag   record video comment
  http://osmium.blogspot.com /people/41e653ab702d333d08de997970bf2374/
• 
  • 
  • 
  

  • Permalink
  • Admin
  • • Remove Post
    • Block email
    • Block IP address

  Cool Cal 3 months ago 1 point

  Please login to rate.

  Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

  My question, Will, is while you do not deny global warming, do you still concede that the magnitude of human impact is debatable, considering 95 percent of the greenhouse effect is natural water vapor, and that the percent of CO2 responsible is .117 percent, of which 3 percent is of the man made variety. To me this certainly suggests, that while there is in fact a very real and cumulative climate change occurring (as others have in the past) leaping to the conclusion that humans bear the brunt of its source is a gross distortion of reality.
  reply  edit  reblog  flag   record video comment
  /people/1efb1c17d4e060496da879b47ecc7941/
• 
  • 
  • 
  

  • Permalink
  • Admin
  • • Remove Post
    • Block email
    • Block IP address

  Bob Murphy 3 months ago 1 point

  Please login to rate.

  Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

  I'm following up on Cool Cal's comment: I know you know this, WW, but in the interest of placating some of the anal climate scientists, I think it's important for people to not say "I do/don't believe in global warming." Of course the earth has been warming, the controversy is how much of this warming is due to GHGs from human activities.
  reply  edit  reblog  flag   record video comment
  http://consultingbyrpm.com/blog/ /people/8fe4e2b214626e70cac8ff5b50497c78/

Add New Comment

Trackbacks