<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Norberg on Klein on Friedman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/07/07/norberg-on-friedman-on-klein/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/07/07/norberg-on-friedman-on-klein/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:25:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John V</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/07/07/norberg-on-friedman-on-klein/comment-page-1/#comment-582665</link>
		<dc:creator>John V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1530#comment-582665</guid>
		<description>I read Naomi Klein&#039;s book. It&#039;s one of the most intellectually bankrupt and comically silly stories I have ever read. It&#039;s so weak, so wrong, so stupid and so misleading, I truly find it incredible that it could have been written as a serious book. She has no idea what she is talking about or what she&#039;s criticizing. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s one thing to draw debatable conclusions from truthful sources, it&#039;s quite another to draw preposterous conclusions from totally wrong information. The latter is what Klein did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read Naomi Klein&#39;s book. It&#39;s one of the most intellectually bankrupt and comically silly stories I have ever read. It&#39;s so weak, so wrong, so stupid and so misleading, I truly find it incredible that it could have been written as a serious book. She has no idea what she is talking about or what she&#39;s criticizing. </p>
<p>It&#39;s one thing to draw debatable conclusions from truthful sources, it&#39;s quite another to draw preposterous conclusions from totally wrong information. The latter is what Klein did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/07/07/norberg-on-friedman-on-klein/comment-page-1/#comment-582664</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1530#comment-582664</guid>
		<description>Naomi Klein is going to be at Busboys and Poets on Thursday.  How nice would it be if someone from Cato showed up with copies of Johan&#039;s rebuttal report to hand out to the crowd?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naomi Klein is going to be at Busboys and Poets on Thursday.  How nice would it be if someone from Cato showed up with copies of Johan&#39;s rebuttal report to hand out to the crowd?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/07/07/norberg-on-friedman-on-klein/comment-page-1/#comment-582663</link>
		<dc:creator>Swimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1530#comment-582663</guid>
		<description>Not only is it plainly true, but it&#039;s Friedman&#039;s justification for his work. He&#039;s saying, &quot;I want to change your mind. I want to do so because, when the time comes, your and everyone else&#039;s minds are what&#039;s going to change national policy.&quot; It&#039;s a populist appeal rather than an elitist dictate. As Norberg points out several times in his short-but-sweet paper, Klein&#039;s interpretation is demonstrably the exact opposite of what Friedman actually says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only is it plainly true, but it&#39;s Friedman&#39;s justification for his work. He&#39;s saying, &#8220;I want to change your mind. I want to do so because, when the time comes, your and everyone else&#39;s minds are what&#39;s going to change national policy.&#8221; It&#39;s a populist appeal rather than an elitist dictate. As Norberg points out several times in his short-but-sweet paper, Klein&#39;s interpretation is demonstrably the exact opposite of what Friedman actually says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
