<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Milton Friedman&#8217;s Argument for Illegal Immigration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/#comment-584937</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1494#comment-584937</guid>
		<description>Will, this is an interesting article.  I would be curious to know how you would define a Guest Worker Program.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Almost all proposals for Guest Worker Program that I have seen do not allow  free and competitive markets with respect to labor (by contrast free labor markets do exist with respect to the illegal immigrants).  In other words, all of the proposals for such programs have details about length of stay, wages, taxation, etc.  Some have even insisted that an immigrant under a Guest Worker Program would have to be paid the same as a legal American citizen.  With such restrictions the employer no longer has the same incentive to hire the immigrant.  So it is still the case that the employer and worker are better off operating outside of the legal framework.  Another downside to a GWP is that a bureaucracy will have to be created to administer it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder if we are just better off just ignoring the problem of immigration for jobs so long as we have a welfare state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will, this is an interesting article.  I would be curious to know how you would define a Guest Worker Program.  </p>
<p>Almost all proposals for Guest Worker Program that I have seen do not allow  free and competitive markets with respect to labor (by contrast free labor markets do exist with respect to the illegal immigrants).  In other words, all of the proposals for such programs have details about length of stay, wages, taxation, etc.  Some have even insisted that an immigrant under a Guest Worker Program would have to be paid the same as a legal American citizen.  With such restrictions the employer no longer has the same incentive to hire the immigrant.  So it is still the case that the employer and worker are better off operating outside of the legal framework.  Another downside to a GWP is that a bureaucracy will have to be created to administer it.</p>
<p>I wonder if we are just better off just ignoring the problem of immigration for jobs so long as we have a welfare state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg N.</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/#comment-584601</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1494#comment-584601</guid>
		<description>Oh, Ida. You are a gift that, hopefully, keeps on giving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Ida. You are a gift that, hopefully, keeps on giving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ida b</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/#comment-584599</link>
		<dc:creator>ida b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1494#comment-584599</guid>
		<description>what i don&#39;t like about the illegals the women have babies to get benefits here and they gey benefits they would not be here if they wasn&#39;t getting government help they gets welfare and social security, while many american citizens names are put on backlog list who apply for social security,and ssi benefits i am one of those person who social security and medicaid are not helping yet they won&#39;t hestiate to give big fat checks to the illegals they gets foodstamps, wic, medicaid, free housing, and schooling and this is wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what i don&#39;t like about the illegals the women have babies to get benefits here and they gey benefits they would not be here if they wasn&#39;t getting government help they gets welfare and social security, while many american citizens names are put on backlog list who apply for social security,and ssi benefits i am one of those person who social security and medicaid are not helping yet they won&#39;t hestiate to give big fat checks to the illegals they gets foodstamps, wic, medicaid, free housing, and schooling and this is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Club Troppo &#187; The rise of welfare feudalism?</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/#comment-581580</link>
		<dc:creator>Club Troppo &#187; The rise of welfare feudalism?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1494#comment-581580</guid>
		<description>[...] Will&#8217;s solution to is to allow foreign workers access to the labour market, but deny them access to welfare entitlements. And if that isn&#8217;t possible, then he argues that the next best solution is to promote illegal immigration. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Will&#8217;s solution to is to allow foreign workers access to the labour market, but deny them access to welfare entitlements. And if that isn&#8217;t possible, then he argues that the next best solution is to promote illegal immigration. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Club Troppo &#187; Missing Link Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/#comment-581575</link>
		<dc:creator>Club Troppo &#187; Missing Link Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1494#comment-581575</guid>
		<description>[...] Wilkinson plays the Milton Friedman card in arguing for a more open US immigration policy (sans social welfare entitlements - he must have been taking notes from John Howard&#8217;s wildly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wilkinson plays the Milton Friedman card in arguing for a more open US immigration policy (sans social welfare entitlements - he must have been taking notes from John Howard&#8217;s wildly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ignacio pijije</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/#comment-582244</link>
		<dc:creator>ignacio pijije</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1494#comment-582244</guid>
		<description>Why don&#39;t discourage immigrants&#39; reproduction, as it was done with slaves? The cost of reproduction is much greater than bringing new young, healthy, ready-to-work immigrants. In fact, illegality, by restricting welfare to immigrants does just that: makes it more difficult for immigrants to reproduce. I think it is a wonderful idea, encouraging illegal immigration. It just honors Friedman&#39;s legacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#39;t discourage immigrants&#39; reproduction, as it was done with slaves? The cost of reproduction is much greater than bringing new young, healthy, ready-to-work immigrants. In fact, illegality, by restricting welfare to immigrants does just that: makes it more difficult for immigrants to reproduce. I think it is a wonderful idea, encouraging illegal immigration. It just honors Friedman&#39;s legacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links: June 2008 &#171; Consider the Evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/#comment-581417</link>
		<dc:creator>Links: June 2008 &#171; Consider the Evidence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1494#comment-581417</guid>
		<description>[...] Milton Friedman&#8217;s argument for illegal immigration, by Will Wilkinson [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Milton Friedman&#8217;s argument for illegal immigration, by Will Wilkinson [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: social security limit</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/#comment-581294</link>
		<dc:creator>social security limit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1494#comment-581294</guid>
		<description>[...] most misused utterance riffing off Bryan Caplan??s also outstanding post which I thought washttp://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/Social Security urging use of debit cards The News JournalFor millions of Americans, accessing their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most misused utterance riffing off Bryan Caplan??s also outstanding post which I thought washttp://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/Social Security urging use of debit cards The News JournalFor millions of Americans, accessing their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg N.</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/#comment-582243</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1494#comment-582243</guid>
		<description>I have a sinking feeling that a hell of a lot more people think the way "Jer" does, and not the way Milton Friedman did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a sinking feeling that a hell of a lot more people think the way &#8220;Jer&#8221; does, and not the way Milton Friedman did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mghertner</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/#comment-582242</link>
		<dc:creator>mghertner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1494#comment-582242</guid>
		<description>Painful to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Painful to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JER MYNOR</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/#comment-582241</link>
		<dc:creator>JER MYNOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1494#comment-582241</guid>
		<description>THERE ARE TWO SIDES OF EVERY STORY.  IT SEEMS ON THIS PAGE THE MAJORITY SEEM TO THINK THAT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS OK. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;HOWEVER, ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PAGE, YOU WILL FIND MANY STRONG POINTS THAT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS TERRIBLE.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;THE MAIN REASON IS THAT ANYTIME A  DEMOCRACY HAS THE FREEBIES, OR &#39;GIMME&#39; ATTITUDE....IT IS SHOWN THAT IN THE YEARS BACK, THIS TYPE OF DEMOCRACY BECOMES DESTROYED IN AROUND 200-250 YEARS....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AMERICA IS NOW IN ITS 232 YEAR, AND EVERY ONE THINKS PAYING FOR UNFORTUNATES IS MORALLY NICE, BUT IN REALITY ,IT IS SURE DEATH.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;THE ECONOMISTS AND HISTORIANS HAVE PROVEN THIS FACT VERY STRONGLY AND STATE THAT UNLESS AMERICA GETS ITS ILLEGAL PROBLEM HANDLED WITHIN 4 YEARS...THIS COUNTRY IS SERIOUSLY DOOMED.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;THIS NATION IS NOW OVER 9 TRILLION DOLLARS IN DEBT, BORROWING 866 BILLION FROM ONE OF OUR FRIENDS(?) CHINA TO STAY AFLOAT.....&lt;br&gt;ADDING MORE TO THE WELFARE ROLES, OR THOSE UNDER OUR OWN POVERTY LEVEL, AND THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER IS AT ITS END WITH HIGH GAS PRICES,HOUSING LOSSES, OUTSOUCING JOBS TO OTHER COUNTRIES, AMERICA IS AN INCH SHORT OF TOTAL BANKRUPTCY......&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AND IN A SHORT 4 YEARS , BRINGS US CLOSER TO THE HISTORIANS WARNING THAT DEMOCRACIES ONLY LAST FOR A CERTAIN LENGTH OF YEARS, AND THEN CRASH AND BURN.....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I FAVOR RETURNING ALL ILLEGALS OUT OF THE COUNTRY, ( IT REALLY CAN BE DONE ) AND RESUME IMMIGRATION AS IT WAS CONTROLLED BEFORE WE WERE INVADED BY THESE ILLEGALS AS WAS ROME....!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THERE ARE TWO SIDES OF EVERY STORY.  IT SEEMS ON THIS PAGE THE MAJORITY SEEM TO THINK THAT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS OK. </p>
<p>HOWEVER, ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PAGE, YOU WILL FIND MANY STRONG POINTS THAT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS TERRIBLE.</p>
<p>THE MAIN REASON IS THAT ANYTIME A  DEMOCRACY HAS THE FREEBIES, OR &#39;GIMME&#39; ATTITUDE&#8230;.IT IS SHOWN THAT IN THE YEARS BACK, THIS TYPE OF DEMOCRACY BECOMES DESTROYED IN AROUND 200-250 YEARS&#8230;.</p>
<p>AMERICA IS NOW IN ITS 232 YEAR, AND EVERY ONE THINKS PAYING FOR UNFORTUNATES IS MORALLY NICE, BUT IN REALITY ,IT IS SURE DEATH.</p>
<p>THE ECONOMISTS AND HISTORIANS HAVE PROVEN THIS FACT VERY STRONGLY AND STATE THAT UNLESS AMERICA GETS ITS ILLEGAL PROBLEM HANDLED WITHIN 4 YEARS&#8230;THIS COUNTRY IS SERIOUSLY DOOMED.</p>
<p>THIS NATION IS NOW OVER 9 TRILLION DOLLARS IN DEBT, BORROWING 866 BILLION FROM ONE OF OUR FRIENDS(?) CHINA TO STAY AFLOAT&#8230;..<br />ADDING MORE TO THE WELFARE ROLES, OR THOSE UNDER OUR OWN POVERTY LEVEL, AND THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER IS AT ITS END WITH HIGH GAS PRICES,HOUSING LOSSES, OUTSOUCING JOBS TO OTHER COUNTRIES, AMERICA IS AN INCH SHORT OF TOTAL BANKRUPTCY&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>AND IN A SHORT 4 YEARS , BRINGS US CLOSER TO THE HISTORIANS WARNING THAT DEMOCRACIES ONLY LAST FOR A CERTAIN LENGTH OF YEARS, AND THEN CRASH AND BURN&#8230;..</p>
<p>I FAVOR RETURNING ALL ILLEGALS OUT OF THE COUNTRY, ( IT REALLY CAN BE DONE ) AND RESUME IMMIGRATION AS IT WAS CONTROLLED BEFORE WE WERE INVADED BY THESE ILLEGALS AS WAS ROME&#8230;.!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/#comment-582240</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1494#comment-582240</guid>
		<description>The population of the world has gone from 1.6 billion to 6.5 billion since 1914.&lt;br&gt;Overpopulation, enegy shortages,  pollution, running out of natural resources&lt;br&gt;were not cosiderations in 1914. &lt;br&gt;Economist only measure progress in by the size of the GDP and nothing else.&lt;br&gt;Friedman was probably getting old and senile when he made the immigration comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The population of the world has gone from 1.6 billion to 6.5 billion since 1914.<br />Overpopulation, enegy shortages,  pollution, running out of natural resources<br />were not cosiderations in 1914. <br />Economist only measure progress in by the size of the GDP and nothing else.<br />Friedman was probably getting old and senile when he made the immigration comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/#comment-582239</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1494#comment-582239</guid>
		<description>"What do you think of 2nd Gen birthright idea?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#39;t see how it can be justified to categorically refuse citizenship to those born in the country because of who their parents are.  (All sorts of small modifications can be made though they may be hard enough to administrate as to make them not worth it.)  Children of immigrants enter society just as children of citizens do, it seems to me.  Would you think it acceptable for the best off to negotiate with the worst off citizens now, to give them higher benefits in exchange for their children not being citizens and so not eligible for welfare benefits?  What if we also cut a deal w/ Angola so that these non-citizens could go there if they wanted?  I&#39;d think that would be clearly unacceptable since parents cannot bargain away the rights of their children.  But the children of immigrants are in the same situation.  It would be small consolation for the children of immigrants that their grandchildren could be citizens.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(The sorts of modifications we might try, if they didn&#39;t prove to be too expensive to administrate, would be things like the &#39;conditional&#39; birthright citizenship found in Germany where those who have citizenship in another country via their parents must choose at 18 which they will keep, or a program where, if someone would also have citizenship in another country, she must &#39;avail&#39; herself of the laws of the US for some time before turning 18 to retain citizenship.  This would prevent citizenship from being granted to people who had no connection to the US except being born there, though it might be too costly in intrusiveness and investigation costs to enforce.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What do you think of 2nd Gen birthright idea?&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#39;t see how it can be justified to categorically refuse citizenship to those born in the country because of who their parents are.  (All sorts of small modifications can be made though they may be hard enough to administrate as to make them not worth it.)  Children of immigrants enter society just as children of citizens do, it seems to me.  Would you think it acceptable for the best off to negotiate with the worst off citizens now, to give them higher benefits in exchange for their children not being citizens and so not eligible for welfare benefits?  What if we also cut a deal w/ Angola so that these non-citizens could go there if they wanted?  I&#39;d think that would be clearly unacceptable since parents cannot bargain away the rights of their children.  But the children of immigrants are in the same situation.  It would be small consolation for the children of immigrants that their grandchildren could be citizens.  </p>
<p>(The sorts of modifications we might try, if they didn&#39;t prove to be too expensive to administrate, would be things like the &#39;conditional&#39; birthright citizenship found in Germany where those who have citizenship in another country via their parents must choose at 18 which they will keep, or a program where, if someone would also have citizenship in another country, she must &#39;avail&#39; herself of the laws of the US for some time before turning 18 to retain citizenship.  This would prevent citizenship from being granted to people who had no connection to the US except being born there, though it might be too costly in intrusiveness and investigation costs to enforce.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shecky</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/#comment-582238</link>
		<dc:creator>shecky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1494#comment-582238</guid>
		<description>The benefits of illegal immigration are being increasingly documented, and the dangers have turned out to be overstated, often very much so. For a while now I&#39;ve been an advocate of pretty much what we&#39;ve been doing until very recently. Which would be mostly ignoring the "problem" of illegal immigration. Incarcerate and/or deport the troublemakers. Leave the rest alone. The reason I&#39;ve advocated this idea is because it would be much preferred to any solution that has been proposed by actual politicians. It&#39;s realistic. And it is least invasive, and least costly. I realize the notion that the law be ignored for practical reasons seems to rub many folks the wrong way, but it&#39;s not without precedent. It seems a good solution until the issue can be dealt with in a rational manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The benefits of illegal immigration are being increasingly documented, and the dangers have turned out to be overstated, often very much so. For a while now I&#39;ve been an advocate of pretty much what we&#39;ve been doing until very recently. Which would be mostly ignoring the &#8220;problem&#8221; of illegal immigration. Incarcerate and/or deport the troublemakers. Leave the rest alone. The reason I&#39;ve advocated this idea is because it would be much preferred to any solution that has been proposed by actual politicians. It&#39;s realistic. And it is least invasive, and least costly. I realize the notion that the law be ignored for practical reasons seems to rub many folks the wrong way, but it&#39;s not without precedent. It seems a good solution until the issue can be dealt with in a rational manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dc wilk</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/milton-friedmans-argument-for-illegal-immigration/#comment-582237</link>
		<dc:creator>dc wilk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1494#comment-582237</guid>
		<description>The problem with the welfare argument is that immigrants do get de-facto welfare through free healthcare via emergency room service.  Also, isn’t it considered a type of subsidy, and hence welfare, if they don’t pay taxes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with the welfare argument is that immigrants do get de-facto welfare through free healthcare via emergency room service.  Also, isn’t it considered a type of subsidy, and hence welfare, if they don’t pay taxes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.648 seconds -->
