Kindlenomics

by Will Wilkinson on June 2, 2008

From the Post’s article about e-books:

“We don’t see people buying both versions,” one publishing executive told Wyatt. “I think there is almost a one-to-one cannibalization.”

Curious. Could it be that there exist people who will buy a $9.99 electronic version but would not have bought the $19.95 paper version? Yes! For I am one of those people. I’ve bought a good number of books on the Kindle, few of which I ever would have purchased otherwise. And most of the actual books I buy on Amazon are used anyway, and that’s got to be worse for the publisher.

I deal with a lot of books for research, reviewing, and Bloggingheads book chats. I don’t so much read these as use them. The Kindle is very bad for riffling, which I do a lot of. And it’s useless for the scholarly task of creating and looking up citations, since, through some gross oversight, the Kindle fails to relate e-book locations to the page number in the corresponding paper text. However, I find it wonderful for actual reading, and I have been on a kick of buying novels and other sorts of edifying literary entertainments for the Kindle. I don’t think I would have otherwise bought The Emperor’s Children, The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao, or Kafka on the Shore, for example. So the Kindle is making these publishers money they wouldn’t otherwise have made while improving my literary um… literacy.

Question: Is the fact that people often wait for the less-expensive paperback version of a book also comparable to eating the flesh of your own kind?

Also: The Emperor’s Children is overrated. It felt to me like an Ayn Rand novel with slightly less cardboard characters (or maybe the conversations of New York intellectuals really are that shallow), no really interesting ideas (despite the evident ambition to have ideas), and often overly precious prose. But it was really fun to read because I like Ayn Rand novels.

  • It's time we started to be okay with dropping page numbers for citations. If you can get a full-text, searchable edition of a book, it's easy to locate a quote in context. Anyway, page numbers aren't a great guide to location for readers who have different paper editions. If you read an e-book version for research, I don't think it's unreasonable to ask *your* readers to chase a searchable edition if they want to check your quotes. Embrace the future!
  • Will Wilkinson
    Ashish, I did like it, a great deal even. But I think it has been overrated as high literary art. I think somewhat 2-D characters are often more emotionally engaging, since I think we often identify more strongly with them because our own self-narratives are usually embarassingly 2-D. (Many people really do find illumination in watching Sex and the City and deciding "I'm a Carrie!") I quite identified with Bootie's naively fierce idealism about intellectual standards while at the same time thinking he turned out to be a pretty implausibly silly character.
  • "And most of the actual books I buy on Amazon are used anyway, and that’s got to be worse for the publisher."

    Probably not, because an active resale market supports higher retail prices for books.
  • Ashish
    It's true that Messud's prose is often a little too "precious", although that adjective is thrown around so promiscuously these days I'm not completely sure what it means anymore. I'll also grant that the character of Murray Thwaite is drawn a little too broadly. And the book's heavyhanded foreshadowing is annoying. But ultimately Messud's treatment of the themes of friendship, meaning, and personal myths (remember the quotation from Dance to the Music of Time?) struck me as more than enough reason to pardon the novel's faults.

    I think one of the reasons the novel was so well-received was because everyone could relate to at least some aspect of the main characters. Who hasn't felt as adrift as Marina at some point in their lives? Or as alone as Bootie? Or as frustrated as Danielle?

    Do you have any more specific criticisms of the book? I'm surprised you didn't like it, and I'd be interested in hearing you elaborate.
  • bjk
    Why not auction off passports and then walk down the streets in Bangladesh handing out the proceeds. It would appear to have the same effect and would result in a more advantageous division of labor.
  • josh
    Most conversations are actually very shallow. Actually, probably 99.9% of all conversations are extremely shallow, whether or not they are New York intellectuals.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: