<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Henley vs. Balko &#038; McArdle? Henley!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/10/26/henley-vs-balko-mcardle-henley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/10/26/henley-vs-balko-mcardle-henley/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Old Tigger</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/10/26/henley-vs-balko-mcardle-henley/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Tigger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=484#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>I think it's more a problem of the fact that the Lib position is "anti-emotional".  Meaning, most folk are generally against the gov't bothering them, and doing the stuff the gov't does.  Generally against it; mildly against it.

But they strongly favor the gov't doing the thing they like the most, or stopping the thing they hate the most.  And so the 80-90% mild agreement does not overrule the 10-20% fervent disagreement.

There is almost no special interest group that doesn't have a positive gov't agenda -- which the LP opposes.  

And, of course, a large mass of voters think any third party candidate vote is a wasted vote.  Libs themselves aren't sure they're much better than None Of The Above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s more a problem of the fact that the Lib position is &#8220;anti-emotional&#8221;.  Meaning, most folk are generally against the gov&#8217;t bothering them, and doing the stuff the gov&#8217;t does.  Generally against it; mildly against it.</p>
<p>But they strongly favor the gov&#8217;t doing the thing they like the most, or stopping the thing they hate the most.  And so the 80-90% mild agreement does not overrule the 10-20% fervent disagreement.</p>
<p>There is almost no special interest group that doesn&#8217;t have a positive gov&#8217;t agenda &#8212; which the LP opposes.  </p>
<p>And, of course, a large mass of voters think any third party candidate vote is a wasted vote.  Libs themselves aren&#8217;t sure they&#8217;re much better than None Of The Above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Agitator</title>
		<link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/10/26/henley-vs-balko-mcardle-henley/#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>The Agitator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=484#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More on the LP&lt;/strong&gt;

Will Wilkinson would like me to respond to Jim Henley's defense of an LP vote. Jim writes:I also suspect that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More on the LP</strong></p>
<p>Will Wilkinson would like me to respond to Jim Henley&#8217;s defense of an LP vote. Jim writes:I also suspect that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
