Spoil Me Rotten!

by Will Wilkinson on October 20, 2004

Luka points me to this LAT article on the possibility of Badnarik as spoiler. NPR Morning Edition also discusses this tantalizing possibility.

Now, to repeat, the fact that Badnarik, despite his nuttiness, is in any position whatsoever to screw Bush simply highlights how much the LP botched it this year.

In other news, Jeff Jarvis recommends that sane libertarian bloggers take over the LP. Good idea!

But don’t forget to vote for Badnarik.

McClain

Sweeet!
:-)

Will Wilkinson

McClain, I enthusiastically encourage free associative performance art commenting. Good work!

McClain

Sera sera, Luka.

Actually, that last comment of mine was a bit of a drunken rant (sorry, Will!)
"nocticeably" should be "noticeably"
And, once I got up a full head o'steam (by which I mean, uh, beer,) I think I blew right past Mr. Wilkinson's position and tore off on a tangent. Tilting @ strawmen, or something....
Anyway, I still think there's a coherent point in there somewhere, but I understand if nobody noticed.
More heat than light, and all that.

Luka Yovetich

(That was for McClain.)

Luka Yovetich

Que?

McClain

Dude, c'mon:
I'm a registered Libertarian, and I'm not voting for that asshat.
If I care about Individual Human Rights, why should they stop at the water's edge?
Who the hell is speakin up 4 all the proto-Libertarian Iraqis & Afghanis out there?
And since when did Libertarian "philosophy" morph into a senile defence of tribal privilege?
You care about our troops dying in the cause of Liberty?
"Well this is new: respect for Ceasar!/
Til now this has been nocticeably LACKING!"
(JC Superstar, yeah...)
Yet you don't give a damn - worse yet: you have a bone to pick with anyone who DOES give a damn - about all those other human beings struggling outside the borders of our primitive nation-state?
And you presume to speak of ethics?
On a, like, "humanistic" level?
Dude: c'mon!